![]() |
| Cooking fresh-caught fluke on my rocket stove |
I've tried to use each day to do a little prepping/survival-based living, which includes gaining knowledge too. A lot of that centers around gardening at the moment if for no other reason than it's starting to become that productive part of the growing season so I'm hip deep in vegetables.
Particularly satisfying has been my cucumber production which has turned into quite a few pints (and a few quarters) of pickles. I started off small this year in the hard, as I always do, with a single 4'x4' plot in which I follow Mel Bartholomew's Square Foot Gardening method. I'm a long-time adherent to that organic gardening style, from way back in the 1980's when he had a PBS television show. Whenever I've had a garden, I've gardened the SFG way.
Sometime after planting that square I came across some YouTube videos from a prepper named LDSPrepper who was advocating a different gardening style called the Mittleider Gardening Method. In many respects there are similarities to SFG such a intensive planting, vertical growing of vining crops, etc. But there are significant differences too, perhaps the most important of which was the use of commercial fertilizers.
The basic argument of the MGM system is that it doesn't matter to plants where the nutrients come from, they're all absorbed in the same manner: they first need to be broken down into a water soluble form so they can be taken up by the roots. MGM says the commercial fertilizers are minerals that are simply mined and packaged so in essence it could be considered "organic."
While I'm not sold yet on that explanation -- though I've seen some university studies that say essentially the same thing -- after watching LDSPrepper's videos and seeing the fairly amazing results he achieved I thought I'd give it a test run. Now my test wouldn't be 100% MGM because the method calls for 18" wide beds 30' long and building some imposing structures to go along with it for the vertical gardening portion of it, it would be a close enough replica in every other way.
This is when I tripled my garden size, expanding from a single '4x4' plot to three 4'x4' plots. I determined one of the new plots would be grown in a fully MGM style and the other would be completely SFG. I made up equal batches of a variant of what's called "Mels' Mix" for the soil, since it's fairly close to the growing medium the MGM method suggests and consists of equal portions of peat moss, vermiculite, and sand. To the SFG plot, however, I also added compost to align more with the SFG way. Both are essentially looking for an inert growing medium, but the addition of compost helps build up the quality of the medium while also adding nutrients.
I got plants from a local nursery since it was so late in the growing season (it was mid-May by then) and duplicated the plantings in each. So if the first two squares in the MGM plot were planted with tomatoes, so were the first two squares in the new SFG plot.
Almost from the beginning you could see the difference. The MGM plot took off while the SFG plot, while healthy looking, grew more slowly. Unfortunately, both plots were hit by groundhogs at different times and each one suffered some severe setbacks. Whether a complete accounting of the two methods can be clearly made is doubtful at this point, but it seems clear from a productivity standpoint the MGM method is the winner.
The photo at right shows the comparison of the two plots side-by-side, with the MGM plot on the left. You can see how much bigger the MGM plants are compared to the SFG side.
I've harvested about 30 pounds of cucumbers to date, 25 of which came from the MGM plot. I've harvested another 5 pounds or so of eggplants from the MGM square, but none yet from SFG. However, when it comes to peppers, I've gotten or 4 from the SFG side, and while the MGM plant is incredibly tall and lush with foliage, it hasn't produced any fruit yet.
Interestingly, I've gotten a few tomatoes off of plants on both sides but the ones from the MGM plot have all suffered from blossom end rot; the SFG ones have been healthy and without problems. Since they both receive identical amounts of watering I'm not sure what the cause of the one is.
And while the MGM plot has been productive, particularly for dukes, I have to say the SFG plot seems more full and rich, even if it's working more slowly than its rival.
As I said I'm not sure if I'm convinced about the MGM method because of its reliance upon commercial fertilizers. I'm way too indoctrinated on the use of organic gardening methods for too long to give up those practices, and because my composting is an enjoyable sideline (that's a story for another day), I can't see me not continuing to garden this way in the future.
Now part of the MGM way is to purchase 2 small bags worth of nutrients from the MGM foundation that don't come in any fertilizer bag. At $15 it's a small fee and they're supposed to last you for two years if used on a typical 18"x30' bed. So since I'll probably only use up half a bag this year, I'll continued my testing of the method next year when my garden doubles in size to six 4'x4' beds! Once it runs out, though, I foresee me reverting back to traditional organic gardening methods.








